Friday, April 26, 2019

Strangers from a distant land

Recent years in the North have been dominated by the strange folks from over the sea, the empire that sent colonists and then vanished, never to be heard from again.



So far I've been calling these people "elves", but it's a very poor fit.  They're not forest-dwellers, not long-lived embodiments of human ideals; they're not archers, and I don't really care whether their ears are pointy.  (I guess they do manufacture toys more efficiently than anyone else, but Santa's elves these are not.)

Instead, these people are:
  • from a coastal hot and dry climate
  • physically weak, bad at throwing things
  • hive-based, where only a few Mothers and Fathers in each city breed, while the rest work
  • excellent tool-users, with nimble fingers and specialized tools
  • flexible and acrobatic
  • milk-drinkers and bread-eaters
To humans, tree goblins, and giants, these people are strange interlopers, outsiders who don't fit the usual understanding of life.

To the northern folk, these are the Strangers.  It's a North-centric term (no Stranger would call themselves one) but considering three of the four intelligent species are indigenous to the North, I don't mind leaning in their direction.


What they call themselves almost doesn't matter, as they've never dealt with other intelligent species until now.  When you don't know anyone else, you end up calling yourself something generic, like the People or the Ordinary Boys.

In the pseudo-American framework of Signs in the Wilderness, the strangers are inspired by English alchemists, sultans of Delhi, Malay pirates, master craftsmen of the Great Qing people from all corners of the Old World, strange and exotic to the people of the New.



I'm still rolling the term around my head, but for now, I think I like calling the imperial folk Strangers.  A few terms I've considered lately:
  • elves
  • strangers
  • imperials
  • southerners
One thing is certain: I'd like to use a name that isn't entirely invented.  Calling them Strangers suggests something, that they're known for being outsiders, mysterious newcomers.  Calling them Abskiul or Marecun or Tsadelath doesn't really suggest anything at all.


(And yes, I'm being deliberately inconsistent with the capitalization of Stranger.  On the one hand, I haven't decided which I prefer.  On the other, I'll probably end up uſing more Capital Letters anyhow for that early modern Flair.)



I'd love to hear your thoughts and suggestions on the topic.  I imagine there's no perfect solution, but I'm sure there's one out there that's good enough.

8 comments:

  1. A problem with strangers is that it's both very generic and very transient. Anyone can be a stranger, none will stay a stranger. So if the peoples have been interacting for some time, they would probably need the term for someone else.

    So perhaps you should consider something pointing to another quality than unfamiliarity. Like overseas people, latecomers, sea-folk, Wrights...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a really good point about being generic and transient.

      I do like the idea of a seafarer name for these people.

      Delete
  2. I understand that the term "elf" comes freighted with meanings that you don't necessarily want to imply ... but there have been a lot of different kinds of elves over the years, and so a lot of different kinds of meanings.

    When you said "elves are like us, like contemporary people living in Revolutionary Era America" I both instantly get what they're like and how they're different from other elves, and I still feel as though their "elf-ness" means something.

    Because wherever they live, whatever their ears look like, whatever weapons they use, one other long-entrenched meaning about elves is that their society is much older than ours, and they know much more than we do. In Tolkein that translates to "elves have a LOOONG history and a LOT of literature," but it could just as easily mean "elves are more technologically advanced than humans."

    ReplyDelete
  3. What about,"Others" instead? They could still call themselves something else.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Would "fae folk" work? In reference towards more unusual manners of the people? Or would "summer people", referring as they come from a place that is summer like all the time?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Using "summer" in their name works pretty well: the summer people, the summer folk.

      Delete
  5. Are these folk humanoid, or something a bit different?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They're primates like us: two legs, two arms, walking upright.

      Here's a post describing them a bit more: https://signsinthewilderness.blogspot.com/2018/07/communal-tool-users-of-dawn.html

      Delete